<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Jolly Lock IP Review &#8211; Will it stop your accounts being banned?	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://mikecruickshank.com/jolly-lock-ip-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://mikecruickshank.com/jolly-lock-ip-review/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2022 08:06:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Miroslav Provod		</title>
		<link>https://mikecruickshank.com/jolly-lock-ip-review/#comment-12577</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Miroslav Provod]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2022 08:06:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://mikecruickshank.com/?p=26635#comment-12577</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://mikecruickshank.com/jolly-lock-ip-review/#comment-7971&quot;&gt;hc&lt;/a&gt;.

I&#039;ve been using them for about 6 months and the fresh accounts I used with them lasted about twice as long (many still going) as another set of accounts I used without them. Just to note, the other set of accounts was subject to priming and pretending to be a &quot;mug punter&quot; and the bookies still got me much sooner then when using Jolly Lock without any &quot;priming&quot; and wasting money on looking like a &quot;mug punter&quot;. The subscription is certainly lower than what I wasted betting &quot;expensive ACCA&#039;s, etc.&quot; and the accounts did last even that I jumped on making profits straight away. I guess it doesn&#039;t protect you from eventually being found if winning long term (or if you bet on arbs or horses day before) as they don&#039;t need spying software to do that, but still it seems to protect you from bookies identifying you as a profitable bettor at an early stage where you might not even have made any profit so I would certainly recommend them.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://mikecruickshank.com/jolly-lock-ip-review/#comment-7971">hc</a>.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been using them for about 6 months and the fresh accounts I used with them lasted about twice as long (many still going) as another set of accounts I used without them. Just to note, the other set of accounts was subject to priming and pretending to be a &#8220;mug punter&#8221; and the bookies still got me much sooner then when using Jolly Lock without any &#8220;priming&#8221; and wasting money on looking like a &#8220;mug punter&#8221;. The subscription is certainly lower than what I wasted betting &#8220;expensive ACCA&#8217;s, etc.&#8221; and the accounts did last even that I jumped on making profits straight away. I guess it doesn&#8217;t protect you from eventually being found if winning long term (or if you bet on arbs or horses day before) as they don&#8217;t need spying software to do that, but still it seems to protect you from bookies identifying you as a profitable bettor at an early stage where you might not even have made any profit so I would certainly recommend them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: hc		</title>
		<link>https://mikecruickshank.com/jolly-lock-ip-review/#comment-7971</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hc]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Apr 2021 17:34:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://mikecruickshank.com/?p=26635#comment-7971</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Doesn&#039;t evading all tracking methods from the bookies, raise flags with them? So the product is counterproductive,  surely?...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doesn&#8217;t evading all tracking methods from the bookies, raise flags with them? So the product is counterproductive,  surely?&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
