<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: What Is IESnare and How Do I Block It?	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://mikecruickshank.com/iesnare/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://mikecruickshank.com/iesnare/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2020 09:52:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: binarytemple		</title>
		<link>https://mikecruickshank.com/iesnare/#comment-4287</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[binarytemple]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2020 09:52:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://mikecruickshank.com/?p=27810#comment-4287</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Better to use 0.0.0.0 as the blackhole IP address - at least on Mac - won&#039;t result in lots of spurious requests to localhost - will just fail]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Better to use 0.0.0.0 as the blackhole IP address &#8211; at least on Mac &#8211; won&#8217;t result in lots of spurious requests to localhost &#8211; will just fail</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Mike		</title>
		<link>https://mikecruickshank.com/iesnare/#comment-1695</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2019 06:19:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://mikecruickshank.com/?p=27810#comment-1695</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://mikecruickshank.com/iesnare/#comment-1693&quot;&gt;Mike Cruickshank&lt;/a&gt;.

Cheers Mike, useful to know.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://mikecruickshank.com/iesnare/#comment-1693">Mike Cruickshank</a>.</p>
<p>Cheers Mike, useful to know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Mike Cruickshank		</title>
		<link>https://mikecruickshank.com/iesnare/#comment-1693</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike Cruickshank]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2019 13:52:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://mikecruickshank.com/?p=27810#comment-1693</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://mikecruickshank.com/iesnare/#comment-1687&quot;&gt;Mike&lt;/a&gt;.

Hi Mike, I&#039;ve never heard of people being banned for having IESnare blocked. A few bookies such as Sport Pesa won&#039;t load the registration form.

Betfair does use IESnare, but you won&#039;t get banned from using the Exchange. All they care about is collecting commission from winning bets.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://mikecruickshank.com/iesnare/#comment-1687">Mike</a>.</p>
<p>Hi Mike, I&#8217;ve never heard of people being banned for having IESnare blocked. A few bookies such as Sport Pesa won&#8217;t load the registration form.</p>
<p>Betfair does use IESnare, but you won&#8217;t get banned from using the Exchange. All they care about is collecting commission from winning bets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Mike		</title>
		<link>https://mikecruickshank.com/iesnare/#comment-1687</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2019 00:06:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://mikecruickshank.com/?p=27810#comment-1687</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Thanks for detailed information and actionable ways of dealing with this. 
Not being &#039;betting savvy&#039; however, I wonder if Bookies would chop any bettors if they are able (possibly) to see that the above actions have been taken ie the &#039;spyware&#039; won&#039;t stick on individual&#039;s accounts?
 Also, again apologies if this is a naïve question, but does this &#039;spying&#039; apply to Exchanges too?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for detailed information and actionable ways of dealing with this.<br />
Not being &#8216;betting savvy&#8217; however, I wonder if Bookies would chop any bettors if they are able (possibly) to see that the above actions have been taken ie the &#8216;spyware&#8217; won&#8217;t stick on individual&#8217;s accounts?<br />
 Also, again apologies if this is a naïve question, but does this &#8216;spying&#8217; apply to Exchanges too?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
